Triple
T27344109
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ATK Sporting |
E684183
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerParentCompanyType |
P192973
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defense contractor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defense contractor | Statement: [ATK Sporting, formerParentCompanyType, defense contractor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerParentCompanyType Context triple: [ATK Sporting, formerParentCompanyType, defense contractor]
-
A.
formerParentCompany
Indicates that one entity previously served as the parent company of another but no longer holds that status.
-
B.
ultimateParentCompany
Indicates that one company is the highest-level controlling entity in a corporate ownership structure, with no parent company above it.
-
C.
laterParentCompany
Indicates that one entity became the parent company of another entity at a later point in time, after some prior state or relationship.
-
D.
hasParentCompanyType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a parent company of a specified organizational or business type.
-
E.
parentCompanyOfOrigin
Indicates that one company is the original parent or source company from which another company was created, derived, or spun off.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef1480a76481908684256ddd5bfda3 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd35d108908190b79b1e8e6bbd62aa |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd34cb46108190b43c3b7f67ec4cd4 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd35d029588190a525aa8a506e7708 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:44 a.m.