Triple
T2733785
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Socratic dialogues of Plato |
E60378
|
entity |
| Predicate | preservationMedium |
P34953
|
FINISHED |
| Object | manuscript tradition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: manuscript tradition | Statement: [Socratic dialogues of Plato, preservationMedium, manuscript tradition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preservationMedium Context triple: [Socratic dialogues of Plato, preservationMedium, manuscript tradition]
-
A.
preservationType
Indicates the method or process by which something is preserved or kept from deterioration.
-
B.
preservationMethod
Indicates the technique or process used to maintain, protect, or prolong the condition, quality, or usability of something over time.
-
C.
notableRecordingMedium
chosen
Indicates that an entity is notably recorded, documented, or expressed using a particular medium or format.
-
D.
preservedAt
Indicates that something is kept, maintained, or conserved in a particular place or context.
-
E.
stateOfPreservation
Indicates the condition or degree to which something has been maintained, conserved, or kept intact over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b75cd908190b691ef0d1801acda |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdaf175808190acbbb3873c7c3f67 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd82859348190bce3be8f2e9d60ba |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.