Triple

T27337127
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eyrewell River E689983 entity
Predicate flowsWithinJurisdictionOf P162546 FINISHED
Object Environment Canterbury NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Environment Canterbury | Statement: [Eyrewell River, flowsWithinJurisdictionOf, Environment Canterbury]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: flowsWithinJurisdictionOf
Context triple: [Eyrewell River, flowsWithinJurisdictionOf, Environment Canterbury]
  • A. territorialJurisdictionIncludes
    Indicates that one authority’s territorial jurisdiction encompasses or extends over a specified geographic area or location.
  • B. definedJurisdictionOf
    Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
  • C. hasPartInJurisidiction
    Indicates that an entity includes or comprises a component, segment, or subdivision that exists or operates within a specified jurisdiction.
  • D. usesJurisdiction
    Indicates that one entity applies or operates under the legal authority or rules of a particular jurisdiction.
  • E. hasPoliticalJurisdictionType
    Indicates the type or category of political jurisdiction that applies to or governs an entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef355e5b388190a8fc1eba9b4a6656 completed April 27, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f62b9e5ba88190a3c0d46edec7afe7 completed May 2, 2026, 4:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f623a91b9c8190b2e2fdbc55cb89b6 completed May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f625402d808190be8279d895d2b27f completed May 2, 2026, 4:24 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:41 a.m.