Triple
T27334941
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HMS Caesar |
E689915
|
entity |
| Predicate | navalPowerContext |
P163920
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British–French naval rivalry |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British–French naval rivalry | Statement: [HMS Caesar, navalPowerContext, British–French naval rivalry]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: navalPowerContext Context triple: [HMS Caesar, navalPowerContext, British–French naval rivalry]
-
A.
navalPowerType
Indicates the classification of a naval force or capability according to its type or role within maritime power structures.
-
B.
navalPowerStatus
Indicates the relative strength, capability, or strategic standing of an entity’s naval forces compared to others or to defined benchmarks.
-
C.
navalRatioPowers
Indicates the comparative balance of naval strength or power between entities, typically expressed as a ratio.
-
D.
navalPolicy
Indicates the policies, strategies, or regulatory stance a state or authority adopts regarding the organization, deployment, and use of its naval forces.
-
E.
navalCountry
Indicates that a country possesses or operates a navy, signifying its involvement in naval or maritime military activities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef355e5b388190a8fc1eba9b4a6656 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6416fbf4081909b0913c337927fc4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63c663be481908f233d25d28713a4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f63fd4f7448190930c723ba7cfce62 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:40 a.m.