Triple

T27331437
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tregony E689809 entity
Predicate electoralCorruption P51943 FINISHED
Object notorious for patronage and bribery LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: notorious for patronage and bribery | Statement: [Tregony, electoralCorruption, notorious for patronage and bribery]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electoralCorruption
Context triple: [Tregony, electoralCorruption, notorious for patronage and bribery]
  • A. electoralCorruptionPerception chosen
    Indicates the extent to which elections are perceived as being influenced by corrupt practices such as bribery, fraud, or undue manipulation.
  • B. electoralDignity
    Indicates a relationship where an entity holds or is associated with an official electoral office, rank, or honor within a political or voting system.
  • C. hasCorruptOfficials
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with officials who engage in corrupt or unethical behavior.
  • D. controlledElections
    Indicates that one party exerted undue influence or manipulation over an electoral process, compromising its fairness or independence.
  • E. courtCorruption
    Indicates that a court or judicial body is involved in corrupt practices, such as bribery, bias, or abuse of legal authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef355d4cb08190ab032c0a2e7d3753 completed April 27, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c29e1b848190b945c6c6120a5330 completed May 3, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c1b6e7a881908deb96bedb2713f4 completed May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:38 a.m.