Triple
T27326067
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rue Princesse Caroline |
E689646
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPedestrianAmenities |
P80014
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Rue Princesse Caroline, hasPedestrianAmenities, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPedestrianAmenities Context triple: [Rue Princesse Caroline, hasPedestrianAmenities, yes]
-
A.
hasPedestrianArea
Indicates that a location or zone includes a designated area intended for pedestrian use only or primarily.
-
B.
hasPedestrianAccessTo
Indicates that a location or area can be reached or entered safely and directly by people on foot.
-
C.
hasPedestrianPlazaOn
Indicates that a pedestrian plaza is located on, or directly associated with, a specified surface, structure, or area.
-
D.
hasCivicAmenity
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, provides, or is associated with a public facility or service intended for community use.
-
E.
pedestrianFriendly
Indicates that an environment, route, or area is designed or suitable for safe, comfortable, and convenient use by pedestrians.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef355d4cb08190ab032c0a2e7d3753 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71f8ee0688190bd025f27993452d3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71cc405c08190863565609a4c8499 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:35 a.m.