Triple
T27306512
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kevin J. Gross |
E689074
|
entity |
| Predicate | litigantIn |
P2238
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Glossip v. Gross |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Glossip v. Gross | Statement: [Kevin J. Gross, litigantIn, Glossip v. Gross]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: litigantIn Context triple: [Kevin J. Gross, litigantIn, Glossip v. Gross]
-
A.
litigantStatus
Indicates the legal role or standing a party holds in a lawsuit or legal proceeding (e.g., plaintiff, defendant, appellant).
-
B.
litigates
Indicates that one party engages in legal action or conducts a lawsuit against or involving another party.
-
C.
defendant
chosen
Indicates that an entity is the party accused or sued in a legal action or proceeding.
-
D.
legalStrugglePartner
Indicates that two entities are engaged together as opposing or allied parties in a legal conflict or dispute.
-
E.
partyTypePlaintiffs
Indicates the classification or category of the parties serving as plaintiffs in a legal action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef355b931c8190a63cafaf7bcc008b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f627afaf648190b187cafdc6f3e8ce |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f620e38aec8190bb184edcdbd6da64 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:25 a.m.