Triple
T27302146
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bathurst District |
E688940
|
entity |
| Predicate | replacedByAdministrativeUnit |
P6576
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Carleton County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carleton County | Statement: [Bathurst District, replacedByAdministrativeUnit, Carleton County]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: replacedByAdministrativeUnit Context triple: [Bathurst District, replacedByAdministrativeUnit, Carleton County]
-
A.
successorAdministrativeUnit
chosen
Indicates that one administrative unit has officially replaced another in its governing or jurisdictional role.
-
B.
laterAdministrativeUnit
Indicates that one administrative unit succeeds or replaces another in time, coming into effect at a later date.
-
C.
previousAdministrativeUnit
Indicates that one administrative unit was the immediate predecessor or former governing unit of another in an administrative hierarchy or history.
-
D.
formerAdministeredBy
Indicates that an entity was previously administered or managed by another entity, but is no longer under that administration.
-
E.
transferredAdministrationTo
Indicates that control or management authority over something was handed over from one party to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef355b931c8190a63cafaf7bcc008b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c1265c208190aacd2b551f8f0f82 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd2415fc81908c23c311aebce66f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:22 a.m.