Triple
T2726672
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Combined Force Space Component Command |
E60208
|
entity |
| Predicate | alliesSupported |
P13524
|
FINISHED |
| Object | NATO allies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NATO allies | Statement: [Combined Force Space Component Command, alliesSupported, NATO allies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alliesSupported Context triple: [Combined Force Space Component Command, alliesSupported, NATO allies]
-
A.
allianceSupport
chosen
Indicates a cooperative relationship where one party provides assistance, resources, or backing to an ally within the context of an alliance.
-
B.
alliesInWar
Indicates that two or more parties are cooperating as allies on the same side in a specific war or armed conflict.
-
C.
hasPoliticalAlly
Indicates that one entity supports and cooperates with another in a political context, treating them as an ally in political activities or objectives.
-
D.
alliedRecognition
Indicates that one entity formally acknowledges another as an ally or partner in a cooperative relationship.
-
E.
allianceStatus
Indicates the formal or informal cooperative relationship between entities, such as whether they are allies, neutral, or adversarial.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b75cd908190b691ef0d1801acda |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdace9f308190964a064859612cd6 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd82586f88190a98f60d3247fe2d3 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.