Triple
T27265111
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kulina people |
E687878
|
entity |
| Predicate | useRiverSystems |
P162290
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Juruá River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Juruá River | Statement: [Kulina people, useRiverSystems, Juruá River]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: useRiverSystems Context triple: [Kulina people, useRiverSystems, Juruá River]
-
A.
useRiverSystems
chosen
Indicates that an entity utilizes or manages river systems for a particular purpose or function.
-
B.
riverSystem
Indicates that one entity is a river system to which the other entity belongs or is a component (such as a tributary or segment).
-
C.
waterwaySystem
Indicates that one entity is part of, or belongs to, a connected network of waterways associated with another entity.
-
D.
tributarySystem
Indicates a relationship where one political entity pays regular tribute or offers deference to another, acknowledging the latter’s superior authority or status.
-
E.
associatedRiverBasin
Indicates that one entity is linked to, or lies within the drainage area of, a particular river basin.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef3557abc481908bf3c146f0f3356a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f626f2c8008190b1e24ed5d521eaa3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f623a91b9c8190b2e2fdbc55cb89b6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:55 a.m.