Triple
T27230758
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Associate in Science |
E682146
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayArticulateTo |
P161809
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2+2 transfer programs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2+2 transfer programs | Statement: [Associate in Science, mayArticulateTo, 2+2 transfer programs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayArticulateTo Context triple: [Associate in Science, mayArticulateTo, 2+2 transfer programs]
-
A.
canArticulateTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is able to clearly express or communicate something to another entity.
-
B.
maySpeak
Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to speak to, or communicate verbally with, another entity.
-
C.
articulatesTo
Indicates that one part connects or joins to another part at a joint that allows movement between them.
-
D.
mayExpress
Indicates that an entity is permitted or allowed to express, convey, or articulate something (such as an idea, emotion, or statement) in a given context.
-
E.
mayEnact
Indicates that an entity has the authority or permission to establish, implement, or put into effect a rule, policy, or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefacdad7881908b7bca61c90a1a1e |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6264ec31081908b14cbdbc604d437 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f620e38aec8190bb184edcdbd6da64 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:46 a.m.