Triple
T27213517
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brewster Buffalo |
E684066
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedEffectivelyBy |
P162258
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Finnish Air Force |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Finnish Air Force | Statement: [Brewster Buffalo, usedEffectivelyBy, Finnish Air Force]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedEffectivelyBy Context triple: [Brewster Buffalo, usedEffectivelyBy, Finnish Air Force]
-
A.
usedWith
Indicates that one entity is typically or appropriately employed together with another entity in a combined or complementary use.
-
B.
usedOn
Indicates that one entity is applied to, operated on, or otherwise utilized in relation to another entity.
-
C.
usedVia
Indicates that an entity performs or achieves something by means of, or through the use of, another entity or mechanism.
-
D.
usedFor
Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
-
E.
usedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is employed, applied, or deployed in opposition to, or for the purpose of affecting, another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefad339a08190aeacb2a198f1a39b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6261ae5488190aaa5d47d94097d12 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f620e38aec8190bb184edcdbd6da64 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f622a8fe7c819096e8a43db263a423 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:40 a.m.