Triple

T2721010
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review E60078 entity
Predicate mayPublish P41858 FINISHED
Object redacted opinions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: redacted opinions | Statement: [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, mayPublish, redacted opinions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayPublish
Context triple: [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, mayPublish, redacted opinions]
  • A. mayAuthor
    Indicates that an entity has the potential or permission to be the author of another entity (such as a work or document).
  • B. maySpeak
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to speak to, or communicate verbally with, another entity.
  • C. maySign
    Indicates that an entity has the permission or authority to sign a document, agreement, or similar item.
  • D. isPublished
    Indicates that an item has been formally made available to the public through some publishing process.
  • E. publishesFor
    Indicates that one entity issues, releases, or makes content publicly available on behalf of, or in service of, another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4b746d248190958e052045c09255 completed March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdab1cb808190b0789c76bc9cb090 completed March 7, 2026, 7:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd8240920819087a812d816a55edb completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abd949c120819099a9d56eb71a0339 completed March 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.