Triple
T27209265
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tintin in the Congo |
E683953
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalChallenges |
P4511
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Tintin in the Congo, hasLegalChallenges, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalChallenges Context triple: [Tintin in the Congo, hasLegalChallenges, yes]
-
A.
hasLegalIssue
chosen
Indicates that an entity is involved in, associated with, or subject to a legal problem, dispute, or proceeding.
-
B.
hasLegalProceeding
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
C.
hasOngoingLegalSignificance
Indicates that a legal matter, status, or decision continues to have current relevance, effect, or consequences under the law.
-
D.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
E.
mainLegalIssue
Indicates the primary legal question or dispute that is central to a case or legal matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefad339a08190aeacb2a198f1a39b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c1265c208190aacd2b551f8f0f82 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd2415fc81908c23c311aebce66f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:39 a.m.