Triple

T27189109
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Swiss 1-franc coin E683419 entity
Predicate hasObverseDesigner P162241 FINISHED
Object Albert Walch NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Albert Walch | Statement: [Swiss 1-franc coin, hasObverseDesigner, Albert Walch]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasObverseDesigner
Context triple: [Swiss 1-franc coin, hasObverseDesigner, Albert Walch]
  • A. obverseDesignIntroduced
    Indicates that a particular obverse design (front side of an item, typically a coin or medal) was first put into official use at a specified time.
  • B. obverseDepiction
    Indicates that one entity is depicted on the obverse (front) side of another, such as the front face of a coin or medal.
  • C. depictedOnCoinReverse
    Indicates that an entity is shown or represented on the reverse (back) side of a coin.
  • D. type2ObverseRefinementDesigner
    Indicates that one design or specification serves as a refined, obverse (reverse-side or counterpart) version of another within a type-2 refinement relationship.
  • E. obverseStyle
    Indicates the artistic or design style used on the obverse (front) side of an object, such as a coin or medal.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eefad140408190b8586fdebcf9af46 completed April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f625a9e3688190996e628a17d211d0 completed May 2, 2026, 4:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f620e38aec8190bb184edcdbd6da64 completed May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f622a8fe7c819096e8a43db263a423 completed May 2, 2026, 4:13 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:31 a.m.