Triple
T27182324
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bath Iron Works |
E683227
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDesignCapability |
P163522
|
FINISHED |
| Object | naval ship design |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: naval ship design | Statement: [Bath Iron Works, hasDesignCapability, naval ship design]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDesignCapability Context triple: [Bath Iron Works, hasDesignCapability, naval ship design]
-
A.
hasDesign
Indicates that one entity possesses, embodies, or is characterized by a particular design associated with another entity.
-
B.
canDesignFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity has the capability or authorization to design a particular feature.
-
C.
hasDesignOption
Indicates that an entity is associated with or offers a particular design alternative or configurable design choice.
-
D.
hasDesignExpertise
Indicates that one entity possesses specialized knowledge or skill in design related to another entity.
-
E.
hasDesignAuthority
Indicates that one entity holds the recognized power or responsibility to make or approve design decisions affecting another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefad140408190b8586fdebcf9af46 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7431c0eec81909ead443e07d75e18 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f74143cf708190a12d487884298437 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:29 a.m.