Triple

T27173655
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New Hampshire public defender’s office E682983 entity
Predicate opposesPartyInCourt P44728 FINISHED
Object state prosecutors LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state prosecutors | Statement: [New Hampshire public defender’s office, opposesPartyInCourt, state prosecutors]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opposesPartyInCourt
Context triple: [New Hampshire public defender’s office, opposesPartyInCourt, state prosecutors]
  • A. opposesPartyType
    Indicates that one party or entity is in opposition to, or acts against the interests or positions of, a particular type or category of party.
  • B. opposedPoliticalEntity
    Indicates that one political entity is in opposition or conflict with another in terms of policies, ideology, or power.
  • C. opposingParticipants
    Indicates that the related entities are participants positioned in opposition to each other within the same interaction, event, or context.
  • D. hasOpposedParty
    Indicates that one party is in an opposing or adversarial position relative to another party, typically within a dispute, conflict, or legal proceeding.
  • E. opponentInCase chosen
    Indicates that two parties are on opposing sides in the same legal case or proceeding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eefad086808190ab89816c0c300476 completed April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b2a65c7c8190ac40f1466ceadefc completed May 3, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b14d7d508190bc7d4c89dfba4a32 completed May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:25 a.m.