Triple
T27173395
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barclay Lights |
E682977
|
entity |
| Predicate | combustibleProduct |
P161935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Barclay Lights, combustibleProduct, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: combustibleProduct Context triple: [Barclay Lights, combustibleProduct, true]
-
A.
isCombustible
Indicates that a substance or material is capable of catching fire and burning under certain conditions.
-
B.
cookingFuel
Indicates that one entity serves as the fuel or energy source used by another entity for cooking activities.
-
C.
combustionType
Indicates the specific manner or category of combustion process by which something burns or reacts chemically with an oxidizer.
-
D.
isLessFlammableThan
Indicates that one entity has a lower tendency to catch fire or burn than another entity.
-
E.
isNonCombustible
Indicates that the subject does not burn or support combustion under normal conditions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefad086808190ab89816c0c300476 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62549039c8190af7159d07416c985 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f61b40f02081909bd9c3ea73249163 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f61fa35ac48190890102c348ed81a0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:24 a.m.