Triple
T27158050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Piece of My Love |
E682575
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableMisheardLyric |
P130802
|
FINISHED |
| Object | alleged use of the word "dumb" in intro |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: alleged use of the word "dumb" in intro | Statement: [Piece of My Love, hasNotableMisheardLyric, alleged use of the word "dumb" in intro]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableMisheardLyric Context triple: [Piece of My Love, hasNotableMisheardLyric, alleged use of the word "dumb" in intro]
-
A.
hasMisheardLyric
chosen
Indicates that one entity has incorrectly perceived or interpreted the lyrics of a song as something different from the intended words.
-
B.
hasLyricsMentioning
Indicates that the referenced lyrics explicitly mention or refer to the specified entity.
-
C.
hasControversialLyrics
Indicates that the lyrics associated with an entity are considered contentious, offensive, or likely to provoke public disagreement or debate.
-
D.
hasEnigmaticLyrics
Indicates that the lyrics associated with an entity are mysterious, obscure, or difficult to interpret.
-
E.
hasUnofficialLyrics
Indicates that an entity is associated with lyrics that are not officially authorized or recognized by the original creator or rights holder.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefaceb2a08190b9659b7f730629f5 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe38be079c8190a240191ac0e73e3a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe350344508190930de2218156ca02 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:17 a.m.