Triple
T27151297
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Wotton |
E682395
|
entity |
| Predicate | satirizedBy |
P161912
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jonathan Swift |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jonathan Swift | Statement: [William Wotton, satirizedBy, Jonathan Swift]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: satirizedBy Context triple: [William Wotton, satirizedBy, Jonathan Swift]
-
A.
hasHumorousTreatmentOf
Indicates that one entity presents or portrays another entity in a humorous, comedic, or joking manner.
-
B.
hasSatiricalTone
Indicates that something expresses its content in a mocking, ironic, or humorous way to criticize or ridicule its subject.
-
C.
hasNotableSatire
Indicates that one entity is recognized for containing or exemplifying a significant satirical treatment of the other entity.
-
D.
parodies
Indicates that one entity imitates another in an exaggerated or humorous way, often to criticize or comment on the original.
-
E.
roleInSatire
Indicates that an entity serves as a character, target, or contributing element within a satirical work or satirical context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefaceb2a08190b9659b7f730629f5 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f624c9aa708190adab4a2808da4811 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f61b40f02081909bd9c3ea73249163 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f61fa35ac48190890102c348ed81a0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:14 a.m.