Triple

T27146681
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mayoress of Arnhem E681968 entity
Predicate hasNoStatutoryPowers P196415 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Mayoress of Arnhem, hasNoStatutoryPowers, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoStatutoryPowers
Context triple: [Mayoress of Arnhem, hasNoStatutoryPowers, true]
  • A. hasNoConstitutionalPowers
    Indicates that the subject entity lacks any powers or authorities granted or defined by a constitution.
  • B. hasNoLegislativePower
    Indicates that the referenced entity lacks any authority or capacity to create, amend, or enact laws or binding legislative rules.
  • C. hasNoExecutivePower
    Indicates that the subject holds a position or role that does not include authority to make or enforce executive decisions.
  • D. hasRegulatoryPower
    Indicates that one entity possesses formal authority to create, enforce, or oversee rules and regulations governing another entity or activity.
  • E. hasNoLegalAuthority
    Indicates that an entity lacks the official power, right, or authorization to perform a specified action or make binding decisions in a given context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eefacca3888190b67238d380e8f28b completed April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe349879848190bcd77e3cc3470458 completed May 8, 2026, 7:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe31e3cf908190b23ebc2f7fe58722 completed May 8, 2026, 6:56 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe349739cc8190a21c408208312e6c completed May 8, 2026, 7:08 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:11 a.m.