Triple

T27135741
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tornedalen culture E681680 entity
Predicate hasBorderRegionCharacter P160921 FINISHED
Object cross-border culture LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cross-border culture | Statement: [Tornedalen culture, hasBorderRegionCharacter, cross-border culture]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBorderRegionCharacter
Context triple: [Tornedalen culture, hasBorderRegionCharacter, cross-border culture]
  • A. hasBorderAreaCharacteristics chosen
    Indicates that something possesses features or qualities typical of a border area between regions or territories.
  • B. hasBorderLengthCharacteristic
    Indicates that a border is associated with a specific length-related property or characteristic.
  • C. hasBorderThrough
    Indicates that a border between two regions or entities passes through or along a specified intermediate area, feature, or object.
  • D. hasBorderCode
    Indicates that there is an associated code or identifier specifying the type or status of a border between entities.
  • E. hasBorderTerminus
    Indicates that one entity serves as the endpoint or terminal location of another entity’s border or boundary.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eefacbcc2081909ebf00daa23f1981 completed April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d0d46aec819091edf97324d793ac completed May 3, 2026, 4:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6cfe2183481908ae4e85a59c66f69 completed May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:07 a.m.