Triple

T27102326
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dial of Destiny E686473 entity
Predicate isDesiredFor P161851 FINISHED
Object altering historical events LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: altering historical events | Statement: [Dial of Destiny, isDesiredFor, altering historical events]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isDesiredFor
Context triple: [Dial of Destiny, isDesiredFor, altering historical events]
  • A. isDesiredFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity is wanted, preferred, or sought after for use, benefit, or association with another entity.
  • B. describesDesireFor
    Indicates that one entity expresses or conveys a wish, longing, or aspiration directed toward another entity or outcome.
  • C. wantedBy
    Indicates that one entity is desired, sought, or wished for by another entity.
  • D. indicatedFor
    Indicates...that one entity (typically a treatment, procedure, or product) is recommended or appropriate for use in relation to another entity (such as a condition, symptom, or patient group).
  • E. isSuitableFor
    Indicates that one entity is appropriate, fitting, or well-matched for use, application, or association with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef1489f8b481908e24a1985982bd26 completed April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f623b76bec8190ad8f66180c8ecbd4 completed May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f620e0b37481909a280574decbd443 completed May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:48 a.m.