Triple

T27100632
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject L’Enfer E686427 entity
Predicate hasAuthorImprisonmentContext P130308 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [L’Enfer, hasAuthorImprisonmentContext, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAuthorImprisonmentContext
Context triple: [L’Enfer, hasAuthorImprisonmentContext, yes]
  • A. hasBeenImprisoned
    Indicates that an entity has been confined or incarcerated in a prison or similar detention facility at some point in time.
  • B. hasBeenImprisonedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been confined or incarcerated under the authority or control of another entity.
  • C. timeOfAuthorImprisonment chosen
    Indicates the specific time period during which an author was imprisoned.
  • D. hasPrison
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is the location of a prison associated with another entity.
  • E. imprisonmentContext
    Indicates that one entity is held in confinement or custody by another entity or authority within a specific legal, temporal, or situational context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef1489f8b481908e24a1985982bd26 completed April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67257b0448190a13011af81c81449 completed May 2, 2026, 9:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f66ec3d3d48190ab2f2b71939e572e completed May 2, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:47 a.m.