Triple

T27066990
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jhinder Bandi E685199 entity
Predicate hasDualRoleActor P108317 FINISHED
Object Uttam Kumar NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Uttam Kumar | Statement: [Jhinder Bandi, hasDualRoleActor, Uttam Kumar]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDualRoleActor
Context triple: [Jhinder Bandi, hasDualRoleActor, Uttam Kumar]
  • A. hasAuxiliaryRole
    Indicates that an entity serves in a supporting or secondary capacity to another entity or primary role.
  • B. hasSecondaryProtagonistOccupation
    Indicates that a secondary protagonist in a narrative has a specific occupation or job role.
  • C. hasHumanCharacterRole
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a role or function specifically associated with a human character within a context such as a story, performance, or representation.
  • D. combinesRoleOf chosen
    Indicates a relationship where a single entity simultaneously fulfills or merges multiple distinct roles or functions.
  • E. hasTwinActors
    Indicates that two or more actors share a twin relationship, typically portraying twin characters or being treated as twins within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef14835fcc81908bd737b4267ae528 completed April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f622ea4d9081909696af9f5078f2e9 completed May 2, 2026, 4:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b3ee7b08190a0a1bc5d26b757aa completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:25 a.m.