Triple
T27064727
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roman Delugan |
E685141
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPartnerInFirm |
P88250
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Elke Delugan-Meissl |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Elke Delugan-Meissl | Statement: [Roman Delugan, hasPartnerInFirm, Elke Delugan-Meissl]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPartnerInFirm Context triple: [Roman Delugan, hasPartnerInFirm, Elke Delugan-Meissl]
-
A.
hasMemberFirm
Indicates that an organization includes another organization as one of its affiliated or constituent firms.
-
B.
hasPartner
Indicates that one entity is in a partner relationship (such as romantic, life, or business partnership) with another entity.
-
C.
hasPartnerOrganization
Indicates that an entity is formally associated or collaborates with another entity as a partner organization.
-
D.
lawPartnerOf
Indicates a professional relationship in which two individuals are partners in the same law firm or legal practice.
-
E.
hasPartnerInWork
chosen
Indicates that one entity collaborates professionally or is partnered with another entity in a work-related context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef14835fcc81908bd737b4267ae528 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7626667f48190ad90867eb67ec582 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f76175d6608190b60b268e20f49ed9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:24 a.m.