Triple
T27055519
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Progressive Reform Party |
E684886
|
entity |
| Predicate | politicalPositionOnRuleOfLaw |
P176708
|
FINISHED |
| Object | support for rule of law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: support for rule of law | Statement: [Progressive Reform Party, politicalPositionOnRuleOfLaw, support for rule of law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: politicalPositionOnRuleOfLaw Context triple: [Progressive Reform Party, politicalPositionOnRuleOfLaw, support for rule of law]
-
A.
politicalPositionOnConstitution
Indicates a person's or group's stated stance, opinion, or policy position regarding a specific constitution or constitutional framework.
-
B.
positionOnLaw
Indicates a stance, opinion, or interpretation that an entity holds regarding a specific law or legal provision.
-
C.
followsPolityOf
Indicates that one entity adopts, adheres to, or operates under the political system, governance model, or policy framework established by another entity.
-
D.
constitutionalPosition
Indicates the official role, office, or status an entity holds within a constitutional or legal framework.
-
E.
constitutionalRuling
Indicates a formal judicial decision determining whether a law, policy, or government action complies with a constitution.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef14829fac8190914bef9ecc3005d7 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e6029a10819098ff21f58079e70e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6e3d5e8188190b1e1c2e5d1b77031 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6e60109648190947a64ca4ce81a3a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:17 a.m.