Triple

T2703891
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Generative Adversarial Networks E59296 entity
Predicate ethicalConcern P18695 FINISHED
Object deepfakes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: deepfakes | Statement: [Generative Adversarial Networks, ethicalConcern, deepfakes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethicalConcern
Context triple: [Generative Adversarial Networks, ethicalConcern, deepfakes]
  • A. ethicalDebate
    Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
  • B. hasEthicalDimension chosen
    Indicates that the relationship, action, or situation involves moral considerations, value judgments, or ethical implications.
  • C. positionOnEthics
    Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that an entity holds regarding ethical principles, issues, or practices.
  • D. moralImplication
    Indicates that one situation, action, or state of affairs entails or suggests a particular moral judgment, obligation, or ethical consequence.
  • E. legalAndEthicalDebate
    Indicates a relationship where an issue, action, or decision is the subject of ongoing discussion and disagreement concerning both its legality and its ethical acceptability.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac66bc88190b9e4afa5fc843f72 completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abda5011bc8190ae4e41da391e759c completed March 7, 2026, 7:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd82062988190b4292f242ad70b2c completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.