Triple
T2703421
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ombudsman’s Office |
E59286
|
entity |
| Predicate | accountabilityTo |
P42085
|
FINISHED |
| Object | public |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: public | Statement: [Ombudsman’s Office, accountabilityTo, public]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: accountabilityTo Context triple: [Ombudsman’s Office, accountabilityTo, public]
-
A.
accountableThrough
Indicates that one entity bears responsibility or can be held answerable by means of, or via the mechanism provided by, another entity or process.
-
B.
responsibleFor
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
-
C.
grantedTo
Indicates that a right, permission, or resource has been formally given or assigned by one party to another.
-
D.
appointedFor
Indicates that an entity has been officially assigned or designated to perform a specific role, task, or function for another entity or purpose.
-
E.
cabinetResponsibleTo
Indicates that a cabinet is politically accountable to, and can be held responsible by, a particular authority or body.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac66bc88190b9e4afa5fc843f72 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abda5011bc8190ae4e41da391e759c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd82062988190b4292f242ad70b2c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abd9ceec708190aa162399023b2273 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.