Triple
T27033849
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Walking Dead #27 |
E680996
|
entity |
| Predicate | coloringStyle |
P20701
|
FINISHED |
| Object | black-and-white |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: black-and-white | Statement: [The Walking Dead #27, coloringStyle, black-and-white]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coloringStyle Context triple: [The Walking Dead #27, coloringStyle, black-and-white]
-
A.
symbolicStyle
Indicates that one entity employs or is characterized by a particular symbolic or emblematic style defined by the other entity.
-
B.
stylingFeature
chosen
Indicates a visual or design-related characteristic applied to an entity, such as formatting, layout, or aesthetic treatment.
-
C.
styleFor
Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, specifies, or is used as the style or styling configuration applied to another entity.
-
D.
editingStyle
Indicates the characteristic manner or approach used when revising, arranging, or refining content.
-
E.
styleRed
Indicates that an entity has a red visual style or is presented using a red-themed appearance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb5566f08190813daf896fa3da04 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6691f5e188190b12c7b2eb729a45e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66598d6008190a7ca8ff80399fd34 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:15 a.m.