Triple
T27026678
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Florida Senate Republicans |
E680806
|
entity |
| Predicate | isMajorityCaucus |
P21029
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Florida Senate Republicans, isMajorityCaucus, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isMajorityCaucus Context triple: [Florida Senate Republicans, isMajorityCaucus, true]
-
A.
isCaucusOf
Indicates that one group functions as a caucus, or organized subgroup, within a larger organization, body, or assembly.
-
B.
votedWithMajorityIn
Indicates that an entity cast its vote in alignment with the majority decision within a given voting event or body.
-
C.
majoritySeats
Indicates that one party or group holds more than half of the available seats in a governing or decision-making body.
-
D.
hasMajority
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds more than half of the total share, control, or quantity in relation to another entity or set.
-
E.
hasMajorityOf
Indicates that one entity possesses or controls more than half of the total quantity, members, or share of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb5450988190bfc9a3c012ac463a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c49627908190b3553474c7c3072b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f23ae081909a52801266063a3c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:11 a.m.