Triple
T2701181
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Israel Defense Forces |
E59229
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasReserveForce |
P35319
|
FINISHED |
| Object | IDF reserves |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IDF reserves | Statement: [Israel Defense Forces, hasReserveForce, IDF reserves]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReserveForce Context triple: [Israel Defense Forces, hasReserveForce, IDF reserves]
-
A.
hasReserveForces
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses additional military or security personnel kept in reserve for potential future deployment or use.
-
B.
isStrategicReserveFor
Indicates that one entity is held or designated as a backup or contingency resource to be used strategically in support of another entity.
-
C.
hasReserveTeam
Indicates that an organization, typically a sports club, maintains a secondary or backup team formally associated with its main team.
-
D.
hasForceCarrier
Indicates that a fundamental interaction or force is mediated or carried by a specific particle or field.
-
E.
commandingForce2Strength
Indicates that a commanding force possesses or exerts a particular level or measure of strength.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac66bc88190b9e4afa5fc843f72 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abda4c8d34819094f5e4cbc5a4bb9b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd82062988190b4292f242ad70b2c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.