Triple

T26997168
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject High Courts of Nepal E680005 entity
Predicate relationshipWithSupremeCourt P199283 FINISHED
Object subordinate court LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subordinate court | Statement: [High Courts of Nepal, relationshipWithSupremeCourt, subordinate court]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithSupremeCourt
Context triple: [High Courts of Nepal, relationshipWithSupremeCourt, subordinate court]
  • A. supremeCourtOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the highest judicial authority (supreme court) within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
  • B. supremeCourtService
    Indicates that an entity serves or has served as a member (e.g., justice or judge) on a supreme court.
  • C. SupremeCourtHoldingRelatedTo
    Indicates that there is a connection between a Supreme Court holding and another legal element, such as a case, issue, statute, or principle, to which that holding specifically relates.
  • D. associateJustice
    Indicates that an entity serves in the role of an associate justice in relation to a specific court or judicial body.
  • E. relativeAuthorityToChiefJustice
    Indicates the degree or nature of authority that an entity holds in relation to the Chief Justice.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeeb52908c8190bd246244686aa455 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff2d22ffb48190ae58ddf3c7e02869 completed May 9, 2026, 12:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff2ac2e1c4819096cc64e94aef2ff0 completed May 9, 2026, 12:38 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff2d21f0a48190ad2ef5901cb07d93 completed May 9, 2026, 12:48 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:55 a.m.