Triple
T26992507
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 3-SAT |
E679892
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusIfPNotEqualNP |
P181035
|
FINISHED |
| Object | believed not solvable in polynomial time |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: believed not solvable in polynomial time | Statement: [3-SAT, statusIfPNotEqualNP, believed not solvable in polynomial time]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusIfPNotEqualNP Context triple: [3-SAT, statusIfPNotEqualNP, believed not solvable in polynomial time]
-
A.
isNPComplete
Indicates that a decision problem is both in NP and NP-hard, meaning it can be verified in polynomial time and is at least as hard as any problem in NP.
-
B.
isNPHard
Indicates that solving the associated problem is at least as hard as the hardest problems in NP, so no known polynomial-time algorithm can solve all its instances unless P = NP.
-
C.
notStatus
Indicates that an entity does not have, is not in, or does not match a specified status or state.
-
D.
statusInLogic
Indicates the logical status or role an entity holds within a formal reasoning or inference context.
-
E.
isInNP
Indicates that one entity is located within, or is a member of, a specified noun phrase (NP) in a syntactic or semantic structure.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb5138ac8190b3c273ddc659a54f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f760a35b988190904e6267553ad2fe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f75eb3d6f081908c933474eb359e3d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f760a2a90c8190b8fbc55412ab752b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:52 a.m.