Triple

T26992469
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SAT E679891 entity
Predicate clauseDefinition P161752 FINISHED
Object disjunction of literals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disjunction of literals | Statement: [SAT, clauseDefinition, disjunction of literals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clauseDefinition
Context triple: [SAT, clauseDefinition, disjunction of literals]
  • A. declarationRule
    Indicates that a specific rule or guideline governs how a declaration (such as a statement, definition, or announcement) must be formed, structured, or interpreted in relation to other elements.
  • B. clauseNumber
    Indicates the specific numbered position or identifier assigned to a clause within a larger document or agreement.
  • C. allegedClause
    Indicates that a clause or statement is claimed or asserted to be true, typically without confirmed proof or legal determination.
  • D. definesClaim
    Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the meaning, scope, or content of another entity’s claim.
  • E. constitutionalClauseType
    Indicates the specific type or category of a clause within a constitution that characterizes the nature of the constitutional provision.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeeb5138ac8190b3c273ddc659a54f completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f621915ee48190b508025afa2fb4fc completed May 2, 2026, 4:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b3ee7b08190a0a1bc5d26b757aa completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f61f109ef48190873bfe18638d2046 completed May 2, 2026, 3:58 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:52 a.m.