Triple

T2699043
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Court of Final Appeal E58585 entity
Predicate canSitWith P33491 FINISHED
Object overseas non-permanent judges from other common law jurisdictions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overseas non-permanent judges from other common law jurisdictions | Statement: [Court of Final Appeal, canSitWith, overseas non-permanent judges from other common law jurisdictions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canSitWith
Context triple: [Court of Final Appeal, canSitWith, overseas non-permanent judges from other common law jurisdictions]
  • A. canSitIn
    Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to sit inside or occupy the seating space of another entity.
  • B. maySitWith chosen
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to sit together with another entity.
  • C. canChair
    Indicates that an entity has the authority or capability to preside over, lead, or chair a meeting, committee, or similar group.
  • D. maySitByRight
    Indicates that an entity has the right or permission to sit next to another entity.
  • E. hasSeat
    Indicates that one entity possesses, provides, or includes a seat for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac269e481909cb317d79e68b75b completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abda339cf48190b9ae6b99137f005e completed March 7, 2026, 7:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd82062988190b4292f242ad70b2c completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.