Triple
T26986631
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | orthogonality thesis |
E679751
|
entity |
| Predicate | exampleImplication |
P1661
|
FINISHED |
| Object | a superintelligent agent could consistently pursue trivial or bizarre goals |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: a superintelligent agent could consistently pursue trivial or bizarre goals | Statement: [orthogonality thesis, exampleImplication, a superintelligent agent could consistently pursue trivial or bizarre goals]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exampleImplication Context triple: [orthogonality thesis, exampleImplication, a superintelligent agent could consistently pursue trivial or bizarre goals]
-
A.
hasImplicationsFor
Indicates that one entity’s state, action, or condition leads to consequences, effects, or relevance for another entity.
-
B.
implies
chosen
Indicates that the truth of one statement guarantees or leads logically to the truth of another statement.
-
C.
policyImplication
Indicates that one policy, decision, or condition leads to, justifies, or necessitates another policy outcome or course of action.
-
D.
assessmentImplication
Indicates that one assessment leads to, influences, or justifies another assessment or conclusion.
-
E.
classificationImplication
Indicates that belonging to one classification or category implies belonging to another, more general or related classification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb5138ac8190b3c273ddc659a54f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f657f653448190a945b4751af8507d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6575ba12081909396036f78757a76 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:49 a.m.