Triple
T26983771
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | War of the Regulation |
E679676
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingAuthorityOpposed |
P181677
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British colonial administration in North Carolina |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British colonial administration in North Carolina | Statement: [War of the Regulation, governingAuthorityOpposed, British colonial administration in North Carolina]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governingAuthorityOpposed Context triple: [War of the Regulation, governingAuthorityOpposed, British colonial administration in North Carolina]
-
A.
hasOpposedAuthority
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds authority that is in conflict with, challenges, or stands in opposition to the authority of another entity.
-
B.
opposedBy
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
C.
canOppose
Indicates that one entity has the ability or capacity to resist, counteract, or act in opposition to another entity or its actions.
-
D.
opposedLawType
Indicates that one law is opposed to, or in conflict with, another law of a specified type.
-
E.
opposedOnGroundsOf
Indicates that one party is against or rejects another party, proposal, or action specifically for the stated reasons or justification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb5138ac8190b3c273ddc659a54f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd49f6dbac81909744373a357b7982 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd48ed68f481908374183c66a6b055 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:47 a.m.