Triple
T26981065
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indian Country |
E679600
|
entity |
| Predicate | recognizedInCaseLaw |
P19834
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Worcester v. Georgia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Worcester v. Georgia | Statement: [Indian Country, recognizedInCaseLaw, Worcester v. Georgia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recognizedInCaseLaw Context triple: [Indian Country, recognizedInCaseLaw, Worcester v. Georgia]
-
A.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
B.
recognizedByArbitralTribunalAs
Indicates that an entity has been formally acknowledged or accepted in a specific way by an arbitral tribunal in the course of arbitration proceedings.
-
C.
recognizesCourt
Indicates that one legal authority formally accepts the legitimacy or jurisdiction of a particular court.
-
D.
usedInLegalCitation
chosen
Indicates that one entity is referenced or relied upon as an authoritative source within a legal citation to support legal arguments or decisions.
-
E.
recognizedIn
Indicates that an entity is formally acknowledged, honored, or given recognition within a particular context, setting, or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb507a7081909d516e1fa08b7d29 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6aaf50be08190a2b62a6d881f8aee |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aa1c555081908787dbf76147f180 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:45 a.m.