Triple
T26981043
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indian Country |
E679600
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPrimaryJurisdictionOverCriminalMatters |
P88343
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal government |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal government | Statement: [Indian Country, hasPrimaryJurisdictionOverCriminalMatters, federal government]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrimaryJurisdictionOverCriminalMatters Context triple: [Indian Country, hasPrimaryJurisdictionOverCriminalMatters, federal government]
-
A.
hasCriminalJurisdictionOver
chosen
Indicates that one authority or legal body holds the power to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate criminal offenses committed within a specified scope or territory in relation to another entity.
-
B.
haveCriminalLaw
Indicates that an entity possesses, applies, or is governed by a system or body of criminal law.
-
C.
hasJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
-
D.
hearsCriminalCases
Indicates that a legal authority or court is responsible for listening to and adjudicating criminal cases.
-
E.
hasCriminalProcedureBasedOn
Indicates that one legal system’s criminal procedure is derived from, modeled on, or fundamentally influenced by another specified source or framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb507a7081909d516e1fa08b7d29 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd783fed9c81909e792702636c4f1f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7788e63c81909de22fdafcfe41c0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:45 a.m.