Triple
T26976987
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kuvi Kondh |
E679483
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEndangermentConcern |
P106049
|
FINISHED |
| Object | language shift to Odia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: language shift to Odia | Statement: [Kuvi Kondh, hasEndangermentConcern, language shift to Odia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEndangermentConcern Context triple: [Kuvi Kondh, hasEndangermentConcern, language shift to Odia]
-
A.
hasConservationConcernIn
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified conservation concern status within a particular geographic area or jurisdiction.
-
B.
isEndangeredDueTo
chosen
Indicates that an entity is endangered as a result of the specific cause or factor represented by the related entity.
-
C.
endangermentType
Indicates the specific way or manner in which one entity puts another at risk of harm, loss, or damage.
-
D.
hasMarineSpeciesOfConcern
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more marine species that are considered at risk, threatened, or otherwise of special conservation concern.
-
E.
areEndangeredOrVulnerable
Indicates that the entities are classified as being at risk of extinction, either endangered or vulnerable, according to conservation status criteria.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb507a7081909d516e1fa08b7d29 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69383222c81909d8baa04129d5c81 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f690eb1e948190aab41a89969519a5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:43 a.m.