Triple
T26975991
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Komal Gandhar |
E679457
|
entity |
| Predicate | filmmakerStyle |
P110214
|
FINISHED |
| Object | melodrama blended with political commentary |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: melodrama blended with political commentary | Statement: [Komal Gandhar, filmmakerStyle, melodrama blended with political commentary]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: filmmakerStyle Context triple: [Komal Gandhar, filmmakerStyle, melodrama blended with political commentary]
-
A.
directorialStyle
chosen
Indicates the characteristic manner or approach a director consistently uses in creating and shaping their works.
-
B.
hasFilmStyle
Indicates that a film exhibits or is characterized by a particular cinematic style or aesthetic approach.
-
C.
studioFilm
Indicates that a film is produced, distributed, or otherwise created by a particular studio.
-
D.
directedInStyle
Indicates that a work was directed in a particular stylistic manner or according to a specific directing style.
-
E.
cinematicForm
Indicates that something is expressed, structured, or realized through the techniques, conventions, or medium of cinema or film.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb507a7081909d516e1fa08b7d29 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6212856b081909baa2f2083383a48 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611af72ac819094598dd2530d7411 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:42 a.m.