Triple

T26966784
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject NL E679191 entity
Predicate acceptanceCondition P161385 FINISHED
Object existence of an accepting computation path LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: existence of an accepting computation path | Statement: [NL, acceptanceCondition, existence of an accepting computation path]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: acceptanceCondition
Context triple: [NL, acceptanceCondition, existence of an accepting computation path]
  • A. acceptanceCondition chosen
    Indicates the criteria or circumstances under which something is approved, agreed to, or deemed valid.
  • B. rejectionCondition
    Indicates the condition or set of criteria under which something (such as a request, offer, or item) is deemed unacceptable and therefore refused or discarded.
  • C. supportsCondition
    Indicates that one entity helps maintain, enable, or is compatible with a particular condition or state in another entity.
  • D. hasAcceptance
    Indicates that one entity has formally received, approved, or agreed to something offered, proposed, or requested by another entity.
  • E. appointmentCondition
    Indicates the specific terms, requirements, or circumstances that must be met or that apply for an appointment to be scheduled, valid, or carried out.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeeb4f3a448190b1e94b2d4776c16e completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f621cbc48881908d104c648c91c715 completed May 2, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f620e0b37481909a280574decbd443 completed May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:36 a.m.