Triple
T26959471
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Louis de Courtenay |
E678995
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableFamilyBranchOf |
P149002
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Capetian dynasty |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Capetian dynasty | Statement: [Louis de Courtenay, notableFamilyBranchOf, Capetian dynasty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableFamilyBranchOf Context triple: [Louis de Courtenay, notableFamilyBranchOf, Capetian dynasty]
-
A.
notableSurnameBranch
Indicates that a particular family branch is distinguished or noteworthy within a broader surname lineage.
-
B.
notableFamilyFor
Indicates that a family is particularly recognized or distinguished for a specific person, achievement, role, or characteristic.
-
C.
refersToNotableFamily
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or makes reference to, a specific well-known or historically significant family.
-
D.
notableFamilyNameOf
chosen
Indicates that a particular family name is notably or prominently associated with a given person or family entity.
-
E.
notableFamilyIn
Indicates that a person is notably associated with or belongs to a particular family within a given place or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb4e75f08190b14fc91ca4a91488 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff59b33a38819086cc9aa19b81748b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff587758f88190a39c2164341dc554 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:29 a.m.