Triple

T26952300
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Puuc hills E678806 entity
Predicate hasAgriculturalCondition P125911 FINISHED
Object thin soils LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: thin soils | Statement: [Puuc hills, hasAgriculturalCondition, thin soils]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAgriculturalCondition
Context triple: [Puuc hills, hasAgriculturalCondition, thin soils]
  • A. hasAgriculturalCharacter
    Indicates that something possesses qualities, features, or uses typical of agriculture or farming activities.
  • B. hasAgriculturalChallenge chosen
    Indicates that an entity is experiencing or associated with a difficulty, problem, or obstacle related to agriculture or farming activities.
  • C. hasAgriculturalType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified by a specific type or category of agriculture.
  • D. hasAgriculturalProduction
    Indicates that an entity engages in or is characterized by the production of agricultural goods such as crops or livestock.
  • E. hasAgriculturalModel
    Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a specific agricultural model (such as a framework, simulation, or methodology for agricultural processes).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeeb4e75f08190b14fc91ca4a91488 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6208ac04c8190b42340e5be9d5b52 completed May 2, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b3d23f481908dfec27adace900a completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:25 a.m.