Triple

T26948649
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2003 Boston Red Sox season E678718 entity
Predicate offenseDescription P161364 FINISHED
Object historically strong offense LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historically strong offense | Statement: [2003 Boston Red Sox season, offenseDescription, historically strong offense]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: offenseDescription
Context triple: [2003 Boston Red Sox season, offenseDescription, historically strong offense]
  • A. offenseAgainst
    Indicates that one party has committed a harmful, illegal, or rule-violating act directed against another party or entity.
  • B. offense
    Indicates that one entity commits, causes, or is responsible for a violation, wrongdoing, or rule-breaking act against another entity or governing norms.
  • C. offensiveCharacteristic
    Indicates that one entity possesses a trait, behavior, or quality that is considered insulting, disrespectful, or likely to cause offense to another entity or group.
  • D. offenseNicknamed
    Indicates that an offensive unit, team, or strategy is commonly referred to by a particular nickname.
  • E. offenceCognizable
    Indicates that the offence is of a type for which police may initiate investigation and arrest without requiring prior permission or a warrant from a magistrate.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeeb4e75f08190b14fc91ca4a91488 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6208771048190b83c9a08156095eb completed May 2, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f611af72ac819094598dd2530d7411 completed May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6125e54e0819088ee33a20efcc9e6 completed May 2, 2026, 3:03 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:23 a.m.