Triple
T26922787
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saint Louis Bertrand |
E677692
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableMiracles |
P169917
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reported gift of tongues |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reported gift of tongues | Statement: [Saint Louis Bertrand, notableMiracles, reported gift of tongues]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableMiracles Context triple: [Saint Louis Bertrand, notableMiracles, reported gift of tongues]
-
A.
miraclePerformedBy
Indicates that a miraculous event is carried out or caused by a particular agent or entity.
-
B.
recognizedAsMiraculous
chosen
Indicates that something is acknowledged or officially deemed to be miraculous, often by an authority or community.
-
C.
miracleOccurs
Indicates that an event takes place which is perceived as extraordinary, inexplicable by natural or scientific laws, and often attributed to a supernatural or divine cause.
-
D.
miracleType
Indicates the specific category or kind of miracle associated with an event or entity.
-
E.
viewOnMiracles
Indicates a stance or belief an entity holds regarding the existence, nature, or possibility of miracles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9bdebc48190ba90a12a63e09c73 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff46afe7e481908f2862ed11c88db2 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff45e9151881909c444a655e852165 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:08 a.m.