Triple

T26920149
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bill Marks E677621 entity
Predicate isFramedFor P62692 FINISHED
Object murder LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: murder | Statement: [Bill Marks, isFramedFor, murder]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isFramedFor
Context triple: [Bill Marks, isFramedFor, murder]
  • A. framed chosen
    Indicates that one entity has been falsely presented or set up to appear responsible or guilty for an action or situation, typically to mislead others.
  • B. framedBy
    Indicates that one entity serves as a surrounding boundary or enclosing structure that visually or conceptually frames another entity.
  • C. usesFrame
    Indicates that one entity employs, relies on, or is structured around a particular frame, framework, or reference structure provided by another entity.
  • D. hasFramingDevice
    Indicates that one entity serves as a narrative or structural framing device that contextualizes, introduces, or encloses the main content of another entity.
  • E. hasFictionalFrame
    Indicates that one entity is presented or interpreted within the context of a fictional narrative, scenario, or imaginative framework provided by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eee9bdebc48190ba90a12a63e09c73 completed April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6200cee788190ba32d1379b50ba57 completed May 2, 2026, 4:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b3d23f481908dfec27adace900a completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:06 a.m.