Triple
T26919136
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty of York (1237) |
E677596
|
entity |
| Predicate | resolvedTerritorialDisputeOver |
P126323
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Westmorland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Westmorland | Statement: [Treaty of York (1237), resolvedTerritorialDisputeOver, Westmorland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resolvedTerritorialDisputeOver Context triple: [Treaty of York (1237), resolvedTerritorialDisputeOver, Westmorland]
-
A.
associatedTerritoryDispute
Indicates that there is a territorial dispute or contested claim connected to the referenced entity or relationship.
-
B.
appliesToTerritorialDisputes
Indicates that a rule, agreement, or condition is relevant to or governs situations involving territorial disputes between parties.
-
C.
sovereigntyIssueResolved
Indicates that a previously disputed or unclear sovereignty claim over a territory or authority has been settled and is no longer contested.
-
D.
borderDisputeResolvedBy
chosen
Indicates that a previously contested border between entities has been settled or resolved through the specified agent, process, or agreement.
-
E.
dissolutionOfTerritory
Indicates the formal termination or breakup of a territorial entity’s existence or integrity, typically through legal, political, or administrative processes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9bdebc48190ba90a12a63e09c73 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62d53ad58819080c5227c7a729d15 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c15952881908a5ea0c25904afec |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:06 a.m.