Triple

T26903548
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject DEA E678090 entity
Predicate keyManagementRequirement P161317 FINISHED
Object shared secret key LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shared secret key | Statement: [DEA, keyManagementRequirement, shared secret key]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: keyManagementRequirement
Context triple: [DEA, keyManagementRequirement, shared secret key]
  • A. keyManagementType
    Indicates the method or scheme by which cryptographic keys are generated, stored, distributed, and controlled within a system or process.
  • B. supportsKeyManagement
    Indicates that one entity provides functionality or capability to handle, store, or control cryptographic keys for another entity or process.
  • C. supportsKeyManagementProtocol
    Indicates that one entity is capable of using or is compatible with a specified key management protocol for handling cryptographic keys.
  • D. keyUse
    Indicates that one entity is used as a key or means of access, control, or identification for another entity.
  • E. keyMaterial
    Indicates that an entity serves as cryptographic key material used to secure, encrypt, or authenticate data in a security-related relationship.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eee9befee48190a26f214faa867be7 completed April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f61fb127c481908bc480561194a264 completed May 2, 2026, 4 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f611af72ac819094598dd2530d7411 completed May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6125e54e0819088ee33a20efcc9e6 completed May 2, 2026, 3:03 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:52 a.m.